1: \begin{definition} \label{def-MZF-2}

2: For $\gamma_1,\ldots,\gamma_r\in \mathbb{C}$ with $\Re \gamma_j >0 \quad (1\leqslant j\leqslant r)$, the \textbf{desingularized multiple zeta-function},

3: which we also call the \textbf{desingularization of} $\zeta_r((s_j);(\gamma_j))$,

4: is defined by

5:   \begin{align}

6:     & \zeta^{\rm des}_r((s_j);(\gamma_j)) \notag\\%=\lim_{c \to 1}\frac{(-1)^r}{(c-1)^r}\sum_{\xi_1^c=1 \atop \xi_1\not=1}\cdots \sum_{\xi_r^c=1 \atop \xi_r\not=1}\zeta_r((s_j);(\xi_j);(\gamma_j))\notag\\

7:     &:=\underset{c\in \mathbb{R}\setminus \{1\}}

8: {\lim_{c\to 1}}\frac{(-1)^r}{(c-1)^r}

9:     \prod_{k=1}^r \frac{1}{(e^{2\pi i s_k}-1)\Gamma(s_k)}\int_{\mathcal{C}^{r}}

10:     \widetilde{\mathfrak{H}}_r  (( t_j ); ( \gamma_j);c)\prod_{k=1}^r t_k^{s_k-1}dt_k\label{Cont-2-1} 

11: \end{align}

12: for $(s_j)\in \mathbb{C}^r$, 

13: where $\mathcal{C}$ is the Hankel contour used in \eqref{Cont}. Note that \eqref{Cont-2-1} is well-defined because the convergence of the contour integral and of the limit with respect to $c\to 1$ can be justified from Theorem \ref{T-c-1-zeta} (see below).

14: %We see that $\zeta^{\rm des}_r((s_j);(\gamma_j))$ is absolutely convergent when $\Re s_k$ ($1\leqslant k\leqslant r)$ are sufficiently large.

15: \end{definition}

16: