1: \begin{abstract}

2: The Gibbs sampler of Park and Casella 

3: is one of the most popular MCMC methods for

4:  sampling from the posterior density of the Bayesian Lasso regression. As with many  Markov chain samplers, their Gibbs sampler  lacks a theoretically sound   method of output analysis --- a method for estimating the variance of a given ergodic average and estimating how closely the chain is sampling from the stationary distribution, that is, the burn-in. 

5:  

6: 

7: 

8: In this paper, we address this shortcoming by identifying   regenerative structure in the 

9:  sampler of Park and Casella, thus providing a 

10: theoretically sound method of assessing its 

11: performance. The 

12: regenerative structure provides both a strongly consistent variance estimator, and an estimator of (an upper bound on) the 

13: total variation distance from the target posterior density. The result is a simple and theoretically sound way to assess the stationarity of the  Park and Casella  and, more generally, other MCMC samplers, for which regenerative simulation is possible.

14: 

15: We  perform a numerical study in which we validate the standard errors calculated by our regenerative method by comparing it with the standard errors calculated by an AR(1)

16: heuristic approximation. Thus, we show that for the  Bayesian Lasso model, the regenerative method is a viable and theoretically justified alternative to the existing ad-hoc MCMC convergence diagnostics.

17: 

18: 

19: \end{abstract}

20: