259004af213b9366.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: 
3: We investigate the possible accuracy that can be reached by analytical
4: models for the matter density power spectrum and correlation function.
5: Using a realistic description of
6: the power spectrum that combines perturbation theory with a halo model,
7: we study the convergence rate of several perturbative expansion schemes
8: and the impact of nonperturbative effects, as well as the sensitivity to
9: phenomenological halo parameters.
10: We check that the simple reorganization
11: of the standard perturbative expansion, with a Gaussian damping prefactor,
12: provides a well-ordered convergence and a finite correlation function that yields
13: a percent accuracy at the baryon acoustic oscillation peak (as soon as one goes to second order). 
14: Lagrangian-space expansions
15: are somewhat more efficient, when truncated at low orders, but may diverge at
16: high orders. We find that whereas the uncertainty on the halo-profile
17: mass-concentration relation is not a strong limitation, the uncertainty on the 
18: halo mass function can severely limit the accuracy of theoretical predictions for
19: $P(k)$ (this also applies to the power spectra measured in numerical simulations).
20: The real-space correlation function provides a better separation between
21: perturbative and nonperturbative effects, which are restricted to
22: $x \lesssim 10 h^{-1}$Mpc at all redshifts.
23: 
24: 
25: 
26: 
27: \keywords{Cosmology \and large scale structure of the Universe}
28: \end{abstract}
29: