1: \begin{abstract}

2: Motivated by the increasing popularity and the seemingly broad applicability of pair-copula constructions 

3: underlined by numerous publications in the last decade, in this contribution we tackle the unavoidable question on how 

4: flexible and simplifying the commonly used `simplifying assumption' is from an analytic perspective and provide 

5: answers to two related open questions posed by Nagler and Czado in 2016.  

6: Aiming at a simplest possible setup for deriving the main results we first focus on the three-dimensional setting.  

7: We prove that the family of simplified copulas is flexible in the sense that it is dense in the 

8: set of all three-dimensional co\-pulas with respect to the uniform metric $d_\infty$ - considering stronger 

9: notions of convergence like the one induced by the metric $D_1$, by weak conditional convergence, 

10: by total variation, or by Kullback-Leibler divergence, 

11: however, the family even turn out to be nowhere dense and hence insufficient for any kind of flexible approximation.  

12: Furthermore, returning to $d_\infty$ we show that the partial vine copula is never the optimal 

13: simplified copula approximation of a given, non-simplified copula $C$, and derive examples 

14: illustrating that the corresponding approximation error can be strikingly large and extend to more than 

15: 28\% of the diameter of the metric space. Moreover, the mapping $\psi$ assigning each three-dimensional copula 

16: its unique partial vine copula turns out to be discontinuous with respect to $d_\infty$ 

17: (but continuous with respect to $D_1$ and to weak conditional convergence), 

18: implying a surprising sensitivity of partial vine copula approximations.    

19: The afore-mentioned main results concerning $d_\infty$ are then extended to the general 

20: multivariate setting. 

21: \end{abstract}

22: