293ce4bb341a59aa.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: %... OJO A LO QUE SE DICE DE SOC AQUI!!!!
3: Extreme events can come either from point processes, when the size or energy
4: of the events is above a certain threshold, or from time series, when the intensity of a signal
5: surpasses a threshold value. We are particularly concerned by the time between these extreme events, 
6: called respectively waiting time and quiet time. 
7: If the thresholds are high enough it is possible to justify the existence of scaling laws for
8: the probability distribution of the times as a function of the threshold value, although the scaling functions
9: are different in each case.
10: For point processes, in addition to the trivial Poisson process, one can obtain double-power-law distributions
11: with no finite mean value. This is justified in the context of renormalization-group transformations, 
12: where such distributions arise as limiting distributions after iterations of the transformation.
13: Clear connections with the generalized central limit theorem are established from here.
14: The non-existence of finite moments leads to a semi-parametric scaling law in terms of
15: the sample mean waiting time, in which the (usually unkown) scale parameter is eliminated
16: but not the exponents. 
17: In the case of time series, scaling can arise by considering random-walk-like signals with absorbing boundaries,
18: resulting in distributions with a power-law ``bulk'' and a faster decay for long times.
19: For large thresholds the moments of the quiet-time distribution show a power-law dependence 
20: with the scale parameter, and isolation of the latter and of the exponents leads to a non-parametric scaling
21: law in terms only of the moments of the distribution.  
22: Conclusions about the projections of changes in the occurrence of natural hazards
23: lead to the necessity of distinguishing the behavior of the mean of the distribution
24: with the behavior of the extreme events.
25: \end{abstract}