1: \begin{abstract}

2: We introduce the notion of a monoidal category enriched in a braided monoidal category $\cV$. 

3: We set up the basic theory, and prove a classification result in terms of braided oplax monoidal functors to the Drinfeld center of some monoidal category $\cT$.

4: 

5: Even the basic theory is interesting; it shares many characteristics with the

6: theory of monoidal categories enriched in a symmetric monoidal

7: category, but lacks some features. 

8: Of particular note, there is no cartesian product of braided-enriched categories, and the natural transformations do not form a 2-category, but rather satisfy a braided interchange relation.

9: 

10: Strikingly, our classification is slightly more general than what one might have anticipated in terms of strong monoidal functors $\cV\to Z(\cT)$. 

11: We would like to understand this further; in a future paper we show that the functor is strong

12: if and only if the enriched category is `complete' in a certain sense.

13: Nevertheless it remains to understand what non-complete enriched categories

14: may look like.

15: 

16: One should think of our construction as a generalization of de-equivariantization, which takes a strong monoidal functor $\Rep(G) \to Z(\cT)$ for some finite group $G$ and a monoidal category $\cT$, and produces a new monoidal category $\cT \dslash G$.

17: In our setting, given any braided oplax monoidal functor $\cV \to Z(\cT)$, for any braided $\cV$, we produce $\cT \dslash \cV$: this is not usually an `honest' monoidal category, but is instead $\cV$-enriched. 

18: If $\cV$ has a braided lax monoidal functor to $\Vec$, we can use this to reduce the enrichment to $\Vec$, and this recovers de-equivariantization as a special case.

19: 

20: %This is the submitted version of \arXiv{...}.

21: \end{abstract}