2d649f1a00c6178b.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2:  Objects and structures gravitationally decoupled from the Hubble expansion will appear to shrink in angular size as the universe
3:   expands.  Observations of extragalactic proper motions can thus directly reveal the cosmic expansion.
4:   Relatively static structures such as galaxies or galaxy clusters can potentially be used to measure the Hubble constant,
5:   and test masses in large scale structures can measure 
6:   the overdensity.
7:   Since recession velocities and angular separations can be precisely measured, 
8:   apparent proper motions can also provide geometric distance measurements to static structures.
9:   The apparent fractional angular compression 
10:   of static objects is 15 $\mu$as~yr$^{-1}$ in the local universe; this motion is modulated by the overdensity in
11:   dynamic expansion-decoupled structures.
12:   We use the Titov et al.\ quasar proper motion catalog to examine the pairwise proper motion of a sparse 
13:   network of test masses.  
14:   Small-separation pairs ($< 200$ Mpc comoving) are too few to measure the expected effect, yielding an 
15:   inconclusive $8.3\pm14.9$~$\mu$as~yr$^{-1}$.
16:   Large-separation pairs (200--1500 Mpc) show no net convergence or divergence for $z<1$, 
17:   $-2.7\pm3.7$~$\mu$as~yr$^{-1}$, consistent with pure Hubble expansion and 
18:   significantly inconsistent with static structures, as expected.  
19:   For all pairs a ``null test'' gives $-0.36\pm0.62$~$\mu$as~yr$^{-1}$,
20:   consistent with Hubble expansion, and excludes a static locus at $\sim$5--10$\,\sigma$ significance 
21:   for $z\simeq0.5$--2.0.  
22:   The observed large-separation pairs
23:   provide a reference frame for small-separation pairs that will significantly deviate
24:   from the Hubble flow.  
25:   The current limitation is the number of small-separation objects with precise
26:   astrometry, but {\it Gaia} will address this and will likely detect the cosmic recession.
27: \end{abstract}
28: