2f9aba7b1414c227.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Despite its paramount importance in the empirical growth literature, productivity convergence analysis has three problems that have yet to be resolved: (1) little attempt has been made to explore the hierarchical structure of industry-level datasets; (2)  industry-level technology heterogeneity has largely been ignored; and (3) cross-sectional dependence has rarely been allowed for. This paper aims to address these three problems within a hierarchical panel data framework. We propose an estimation procedure and then derive the corresponding asymptotic theory. Finally, we apply the framework to a dataset of 23 manufacturing industries from a wide range of countries over the period 1963-2018. Our results show that both the manufacturing industry as a whole and individual manufacturing industries at the ISIC
3: %\footnote{{\bf Guohua}: We should give its full name before using the abbreviation. \textbf{Response:} We have a footnote to explain ISIC in the data section (i.e., Section 4). After checking the literature, we believe it is ok to just use the abbreviation here.} 
4: two-digit level exhibit strong conditional convergence in labour productivity, but not unconditional  convergence. In addition, our results show that both global and industry-specific  shocks are important in explaining the convergence behaviours of the manufacturing industries.
5: 
6: 
7: \end{abstract}
8: