1: \begin{abstract}

2: The {\em Meshless Local Petrov--Galerkin} (MLPG) method

3:  is one of the popular meshless methods

4: that has been used very successfully to solve several types of boundary

5: value problems since the late nineties. In this paper, using a generalized

6: moving least squares (GMLS) approximation, a new {\em direct}

7: MLPG technique, called DMLPG,

8: is presented. Following the principle

9: of meshless methods to express

10: everything ``entirely in terms of nodes'',

11: the generalized MLS recovers test functionals directly from values at nodes,

12: without any detour via shape functions.

13: This leads to a cheaper and even more accurate

14: scheme. In particular, the complete absence of shape functions

15: allows numerical integrations in the weak forms of the problem to be done

16: over low--degree polynomials instead of complicated shape functions.

17: Hence, the standard MLS shape

18: function subroutines are not called at all.

19: Numerical examples illustrate the superiority

20: of the  new technique over the classical

21: MLPG. On the theoretical side,

22: this paper

23: discusses

24: stability and convergence for the new discretizations

25: that replace those of the standard MLPG. However, it does not

26: treat stability, convergence, or error estimation for the MLPG as a whole.

27: This should be taken from the literature on MLPG.

28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

29: %{\em Keywords.} Generalized Moving least squares (GMLS) approximation; Meshless methods; MLPG methods; DMLPG methods; Local polynomial reproduction.

30: %

31: \end{abstract}

32: