1: \begin{abstract}

2: The alternating-current optimal power flow \EDIT{(ACOPF)} is one of the best known non-convex non-linear optimisation problems. 

3: \EDIT{We present a} novel re-formulation of ACOPF, \EDIT{which is based on lifting the rectangular power-voltage rank-constrained formulation,} 

4: and makes it possible to derive \EDIT{alternative} SDP relaxations. 

5: For those, we develop a first-order method based on the \EDIT{parallel} coordinate descent \EDIT{with a novel closed-form step based on roots of cubic polynomials}.

6: %\EDIT{quite unlike second-order interior-point methods used to solve convexifications recently.}   

7: 

8: %A novel rank-constrained re-formulation of alternating-current optimal power flow problem

9: %makes it possible to derive novel semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations. For those, we 

10: %develop a solver, which is often as widely used methods with no convergence guarantees, 

11: %within the same accuracy. 

12: 

13: %for the standard datasets, 

14: %In line with previous observations, the objective value of the optimum of the SDP relaxation 

15: %is often considerably better than the one obtained with Matpower, e.g., by 38.19\% on case9mod. 

16: %\todo[inline]{I think we have to explude the MOD dataset....}

17: 

18: %and by 7.97\% on case30Q.

19: %\rr{we spoke that the case30Q should be exluded, not sure if some similar issue are with case9mod as well??}

20: % I'll check that, again, but afaik case9mod is "for real".

21: \end{abstract}

22: