1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: We present the first flexion-focused gravitational lensing analysis of 

4: the first of the strong-lensing ``cosmic telescope" galaxy clusters, 

5: observed as part of the \emph{Hubble Frontier Fields} initiative. 

6: %

7: Using HST observations of Abell 2744 (z = 0.308), 

8: we apply a modified Analytic Image Model (AIM) 

9: technique to measure source galaxy flexion and shear values at a 

10: final number density of 82 arcmin\(^{-2}\).

11: %

12: By using flexion data alone we are able to identify the primary 

13: mass structure aligned along the heart of the cluster 

14: in addition to a major substructure peak offset \(1.43'\) from the 

15: cluster core. 

16: %

17: We generate two types of nonparametric reconstructions: 

18: a flexion aperture mass map, which identified the 

19: central potential and substructure peak with mass signal-to-noise 

20: of \(3.5\sigma\) and \(2.3\sigma\) respectively; and a convergence 

21: map derived directly from the smoothed flexion field.

22: %

23: For the primary peak we find a mass of 

24: \(1.93\times10^{14}\,h^{-1}\,M_{\odot}\) within a 45" (145\(h^{-1}\) kpc)

25: aperture, and for the western substructure we find a mass of 

26: \(7.12\times10^{13}\,h^{-1}\,M_{\odot}\) within a 

27: 25" (80\(h^{-1}\) kpc) aperture. The associated peak velocity

28: dispersions were determined to be \(\sigma_v = 1630\) km/s 

29: and \(\sigma_v = 766\) km/s, respectively, by fitting nonsingular

30: isothermal sphere profiles to the flexion data.

31: %

32: Additionally, we use simultaneous shear measurements 

33: to independently reconstruct the broader cluster mass structure, and 

34: find that it is unable to reproduce the small-scale structure associated with 

35: the flexion reconstructions.

36: %

37: Finally, we perform the same analysis on the Abell 2744 parallel sky field, 

38: and find no strong phantom signals in the noise reconstructions.

39: 

40: \end{abstract}

41: