1: \begin{abstract}

2: We assess the resources  needed to identify a reversible quantum gate among a finite set of alternatives, including in our analysis both deterministic and probabilistic  strategies.   

3: Among the probabilistic strategies, we consider  unambiguous gate discrimination---where errors are not tolerated but inconclusive outcomes are allowed---and  we prove that parallel strategies are sufficient to unambiguously identify the unknown gate with  minimum number of queries. This result is used to provide upper and lower bounds on the query complexity and on the minimum ancilla dimension.   

4: In addition, we introduce the  notion of generalized $t$-designs, which includes unitary $t$-designs and group representations as special cases.   For gates forming a generalized $t$-design we give an explicit expression for the maximum probability of correct gate identification and we  prove  that there is no gap between the performances of deterministic strategies an those of probabilistic strategies. 

5:  Hence, evaluating of the query complexity of perfect deterministic discrimination is reduced to  the easier problem of evaluating the query complexity of unambiguous discrimination.  Finally,  we consider discrimination strategies where the use of ancillas is forbidden, providing upper bounds on the number of  additional queries needed to make up for the lack of entanglement with the ancillas.

6: 

7: %Our bounds show that the minimum number of queries needed for perfect discrimination is  significantly smaller than the number required by the best known strategy based on pairwise tests.  

8:  \end{abstract}

9: