1: \begin{abstract}
2:
3: We discuss the scattering equivalence of the generalized
4: Bakamjian-Thomas construction of dynamical representations of the
5: Poincar\'e group in all of Dirac's forms of dynamics. The
6: equivalence was established by Sokolov in the context of proving
7: that the equivalence holds for models that satisfy cluster
8: separability. The generalized Bakamjian Thomas construction is used
9: in most applications, even though it only satisfies cluster
10: properties for systems of less than four particles. Different forms
11: of dynamics are related by unitary transformations that remove
12: interactions from some infinitesimal generators and introduce them
13: to other generators. These unitary transformation must be
14: interaction dependent, because they can be applied to a
15: non-interacting generator and produce an interacting generator.
16: This suggests that these transformations can generate complex
17: many-body forces when used in many-body problems. It turns out that
18: this is not the case. In all cases of interest the result of
19: applying the unitary scattering equivalence results in
20: representations that have simple relations, even though the unitary
21: transformations are dynamical. This applies to many-body models as
22: well as models with particle production. In all cases no new
23: many-body operators are generated by the unitary scattering
24: equivalences relating the different forms of dynamics.
25: This makes it clear that the various calculations used
26: in applications that emphasize one form of the dynamics over another
27: are equivalent. Furthermore, explicit representations of the
28: equivalent dynamical models in any form of dynamics are easily
29: constructed. Where differences do appear is when electromagnetic
30: probes are treated in the one-photon exchange approximation. This
31: approximation is different in each of Dirac's forms of dynamics.
32:
33: \end{abstract}
34: