354502ebf76d1e77.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We correct two errors in our paper \cite{our_paper}.
3: First error concerns the definition of the SVI solution,
4: where a boundary term which arises due to the Dirichlet boundary condition, was not included.
5: The second error concerns the discrete estimate \cite[Lemma 4.4]{our_paper}, which involves the discrete Laplace operator.
6: We provide an alternative proof of the estimate in spatial dimension $d=1$ by using a mass lumped version of the {discrete} Laplacian. 
7: Hence, after a minor modification of the fully discrete numerical scheme the convergence in $d=1$
8: follows along the lines of the original proof.
9: The convergence proof of the time semi-discrete scheme, which relies on the continuous counterpart of the estimate \cite[Lemma 4.4]{our_paper}, remains valid in higher spatial dimension. 
10: {The convergence of the fully discrete finite element scheme from \cite{our_paper} in any spatial dimension is shown in \cite{stvf_new} by using a different approach.}
11: \end{abstract}
12: