1: \begin{abstract}

2: 	%

3: 	Under the organization of the base station (BS), wireless federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training among multiple devices.

4: 	%

5: 	However, the BS is merely responsible for aggregating local updates during the training process, which incurs a waste of the computational resource at the BS.

6: 	%

7: 	To tackle this issue, we propose a semi-federated learning (SemiFL) paradigm to leverage the computing capabilities of both the BS and devices for a hybrid implementation of centralized learning (CL) and FL.

8: 	% 

9: 	Specifically, each device sends both local gradients and data samples to the BS for training a shared global model.

10: 	%

11: 	To improve communication efficiency over the same time-frequency resources, we integrate over-the-air computation for aggregation and non-orthogonal multiple access for transmission by designing a novel transceiver structure.

12: 	%

13: 	To gain deep insights, we conduct convergence analysis by deriving a closed-form optimality gap for SemiFL and extend the result to two extra cases.

14: 	% 

15: 	In the first case, the BS uses all accumulated data samples to calculate the CL gradient, while a decreasing learning rate is adopted in the second case.

16: 	%

17: 	Our analytical results capture the destructive effect of wireless communication and show that both FL and CL are special cases of SemiFL.

18: 	%

19: 	Then, we formulate a non-convex problem to reduce the optimality gap by jointly optimizing the transmit power and receive beamformers.

20: 	%

21: 	Accordingly, we propose a two-stage algorithm to solve this intractable problem, in which we provide the closed-form solutions to the beamformers.

22: 	%

23: 	Extensive simulation results on two real-world datasets corroborate our theoretical analysis, and show that the proposed SemiFL outperforms conventional FL and achieves $3.2\%$ accuracy gain on the MNIST dataset compared to state-of-the-art benchmarks.

24: \end{abstract}