1: \begin{abstract}

2: To help reveal the complete picture of linear kinetic drift modes,

3: four independent numerical approaches, based on integral equation,

4: Euler initial value simulation, Euler matrix eigenvalue solution and

5: Lagrangian particle simulation, respectively, are used to solve the

6: linear gyrokinetic electrostatic drift modes equation in Z-pinch

7: with slab simplification and in tokamak with ballooning space

8: coordinate. We identify that these approaches can yield the same

9: solution with the difference smaller than 1\%, and the discrepancies

10: mainly come from the numerical convergence, which is the first

11: detailed benchmark of four independent numerical approaches for

12: gyrokinetic linear drift modes. Using these approaches, we find that

13: the entropy mode and interchange mode are on the same branch in

14: Z-pinch, and the entropy mode can have both electron and ion

15: branches. And, at strong gradient, more than one eigenstate of the

16: ion temperature gradient mode (ITG) can be unstable and the most

17: unstable one can be on non-ground eigenstates. The propagation of

18: ITGs from ion to electron diamagnetic direction at strong gradient

19: is also observed, which implies that the propagation direction is

20: not a decisive criterion for the experimental diagnosis of turbulent

21: mode at the edge plasmas.

22: \end{abstract}

23: