1: \begin{abstract}

2: Let $(\pi_\z,V_\z)$ be an unramified principal series representation

3: of a reductive group over a nonarchimedean local field, parametrized

4: by an element $\z$ of the maximal torus in the Langlands dual group.

5: If $v$ is an element of the Weyl group $W$, then the standard

6: intertwining integral $\mathcal{A}_v$ maps $V_\z$ to $V_{v\z}$.

7: Letting $\psi^\z_w$ with $w\in W$ be a suitable basis of the

8: Iwahori fixed vectors in $V_\z$, and $\widehat\psi^\z_w$ a basis

9: of the contragredient representation, we define $\sigma(u,v,w)$

10: (for $u,v,w\in W$) to be $\langle \mathcal{A}_v\psi_u^\z,\widehat\psi^{v\z}_w\rangle$.

11: This is an interesting function and we initiate its study. We

12: show that given $u$ and $w$, there is a minimal $v$ such that

13: $\sigma(u,v,w)\neq 0$. Denoting this $v$ as $\vmin=\vmin(u,w)$, we will

14: prove that $\sigma(u,\vmin,w)$ is a polynomial of the cardinality

15: $q$ of the residue field. Indeed if $v>\vmin$, then $\sigma(u,v,w)$

16: is a rational function of $\z$ and $q$, whose denominator we

17: describe. But if $v=\vmin$, the dependence on $\z$ disappears.

18: We will express $\sigma(u,v_\vmin,w)$

19: as the Poincar\'e polynomial of a Bruhat interval. The proof

20: leads to fairly intricate considerations of the Bruhat order.

21: 

22: Thus our results require us to prove some facts that may be of

23: independent interest, relating the Bruhat

24: order $\leqslant$ and the weak Bruhat order $\leqslant_R$.

25: For example we will prove (for finite Coxeter groups) the following ``mixed meet''

26: property. If $u, w$ are elements of $W$, then there exists 

27: a unique element $m \in W$ that is maximal

28: with respect to the condition that $m \leqslant_R u$ and $m \leqslant w$. Thus

29: if $z \leqslant_R u$ and $z \leqslant w$, then $x \leqslant m$.

30: The value $\vmin$ is $m^{-1}u$.

31: \end{abstract}

32: