1: \begin{abstract}

2:     Iterative graph algorithms often compute intermediate

3:     values and update them as computation progresses.

4:     Updated output values are used as inputs for computations in current or subsequent iterations;

5:     hence the number of iterations required for values to converge can potentially reduce

6:     if the newest values are asynchronously made 

7:     available to other updates computed in the same iteration.

8:     In a multi-threaded shared memory system, the immediate propagation of updated values can cause

9:     memory contention that may offset the benefit of propagating updates sooner.

10:     In some cases, the benefit of a smaller number of iterations may be 

11:     diminished by each iteration taking longer.

12:     Our key idea is to combine the low memory contention that synchronous approaches have

13:     with the faster information sharing of asynchronous approaches.

14:     Our hybrid approach buffers updates from threads locally before committing 

15:     them to the global store to control how often threads may cause conflicts for others

16:     while still sharing data within one iteration and hence speeding convergence. 

17:     On a 112-thread CPU system, our hybrid approach attains up to 

18:     4.5\% - 19.4\% speedup over an asynchronous approach for Pagerank

19:     and up to 1.9\% - 17\% speedup over asynchronous Bellman Ford SSSP.

20:     Further, our hybrid approach attains 2.56x better performance than the synchronous approach.

21:     Finally, we provide insights as to why delaying updates is not helpful on certain graphs

22:     where connectivity is clustered on the main diagonal of the adjacency matrix.

23: \end{abstract}

24: