1: \begin{proof}

2: % See \cite{Bli14} or \cite[page 69]{Cas71}. {\tt I checked the paper and the book, but I don't see where this statement is proved... See page 1031 of [Lagarias and Ziegler, bounds for lattice polytopes containing a fixed number of interior points in a sublattice]. See also Lekkerkerker's book Geomertry of Numbers, end of page 55} 

3: 

4: % {\tt Actually it seems that a slightly worse, but good enough bound $\vol(\CC) \geq |\CC\cap\Z^d|/(d+1)!$ is quite intuitive. See\\

5: % http://mathoverflow.net/questions/119449/ \\

6: % volume-like-property-to-upper-bound-lattice-points-in-a-convex-body  \\

7: % However I do not know how to make this argument rigorous, i.e. not wave hands about the splitting. Apparently a more careful estimate for the number of simplicese seems to be at least the number of lattice points minus (dimension-1) so this should lead to Blichfeldt as well.

8: % }

9: % \end{proof}

10: