1: \begin{abstract}

2:   The energy levels of light hypernuclei are experimentally accessible

3:   observables that contain valuable information about the interaction

4:   between hyperons and nucleons. In this work we study strangeness

5:   $S = -1$ systems \hnuc{3,4}{H} and \hnuc{4,5}{He} using the

6:   \emph{ab~initio} no-core shell model (NCSM) with realistic

7:   interactions obtained from chiral effective field theory

8:   ($\chi$EFT). In particular, we quantify the finite precision of

9:   theoretical predictions that can be attributed to nuclear physics

10:   uncertainties. We study both the convergence of the solution of the

11:   many-body problem (method uncertainty) and the regulator-{} and

12:   calibration data-dependence of the nuclear $\chi$EFT Hamiltonian

13:   (model uncertainty). For the former, we implement infrared

14:   correction formulas and extrapolate finite-space NCSM results to

15:   infinite model space. We then use Bayesian parameter estimation to

16:   quantify the resulting method uncertainties. For the latter, we

17:   employ a family of 42 realistic Hamiltonians and measure the

18:   standard deviation of predictions while keeping the leading-order

19:   hyperon--nucleon interaction fixed. Following this procedure we find

20:   that model uncertainties of ground-state \(\Lambda\) separation

21:   energies amount to $\sim \unit[20(100)]{keV}$ in

22:   \hnuc{3}{H}(\hnuc{4}{H,He}) and $\sim\unit[400]{keV}$ in

23:   \hnuc{5}{He}. Method uncertainties are comparable in magnitude for

24:   the \hnuc{4}{H,He} \(1^+\) excited states and \hnuc{5}{He}, which

25:   are computed in limited model spaces, but otherwise much smaller.

26:   This knowledge of expected theoretical precision is crucial for the

27:   use of binding energies of light hypernuclei to infer the elusive

28:   hyperon--nucleon interaction.

29: \end{abstract}

30: