1: \begin{abstract}

2: {\small In a paper appearing in this issue of Phys. Lett. A, Ericsson et al.

3: raise some critical comments on the experiment [Phys. Lett. A \ 373 (2009)

4: 1956] we carried out by cavitating a solution of thorium-228, which

5: evidenced its anomalous decay behaviour, thus confirming the results

6: previously obtained by Urutskoev et al. by explosion of titanium foils in

7: solutions. In this letter, we reply to these comments. In our opinion, the

8: main shortcomings of the criticism by the Swedish authors are due to their

9: omitting of inserting our experiment in the wider research stream of

10: piezonuclear reactions, and to the statistical analysis they used, which

11: does not comply with the rules generally accepted for samples with small

12: numbers. However, apart from any possible theoretical speculation, there is

13: the basic fact that two different experiments (ours and that by Urutskoev et

14: al.), carried out independently and by different means, highlight an

15: analogous anomaly in the decay of thorium subjected to pressure waves. Such

16: a convergence of results shows that it is worth to further carry on

17: experimental investigations, in order to get either a confirmation or a

18: disproof of the induced-pressure anomalous behaviour of radioactive nuclides

19: even different from thorium. }

20: \end{abstract}

21: