3d252babaa60f522.tex
1: \begin{proof}
2: Let $M>0$. 
3:   Proposition~\ref{prop:Sigmaloc2} shows that the only obstruction to
4:   well-posedness on  $[0,M]$ is the existence of a
5:   time $0<T<M$ such that 
6: \begin{equation*}
7:   \|x u(t)\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}
8: \mathop{\longrightarrow}\limits_{t{\mathop{\rightarrow}\limits_<}  T} 
9:  +\infty.  
10: \end{equation*}
11: So long as $u\in
12: C([0,t];\Sigma)$, we have (see e.g. \cite{CazCourant} for the
13: arguments that make the computation rigorous) 
14: \begin{equation}
15:   \label{eq:evolmoment}
16:    \frac{d}{dt}\int_{\R^d}x_j^2 \lvert u(t,x)\rvert^2dx = 2\IM
17:     \int_{\R^d}x_j \overline 
18:     u(t,x)\d_j u (t,x)dx.  
19: \end{equation}
20: Suppose  $u\in L^\infty ([0,T];H^1)$. Then the above formula,
21: Cauchy--Schwarz inequality and Gronwall lemma show that $x u\in L^\infty
22: ([0,T];L^2)$,
23: hence a contradiction. The corollary follows, since $M>0$ is arbitrary. 
24: \end{proof}
25: