1: \begin{abstract}

2: We study multiproposal Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms, such as Multiple-try or generalised Metropolis-Hastings schemes, which have recently received renewed attention due to their amenability to parallel computing.

3: First, we prove that no multiproposal scheme can speed-up convergence relative to the corresponding single proposal scheme by more than a factor of $K$, where $K$ denotes the number of proposals at each iteration.

4: This result applies to arbitrary target distributions and it implies that serial multiproposal implementations are always less efficient than single proposal ones. 

5: Secondly, we consider log-concave distributions over Euclidean spaces, 

6: proving that, in this case, the speed-up is at most logarithmic in $K$, which implies that even parallel multiproposal implementations are fundamentally limited in the computational gain they can offer.

7: Crucially, our results apply to arbitrary multiproposal schemes and purely rely on the two-step structure of the associated kernels (i.e.\ first generate $K$ candidate points, then select one among those). Our theoretical findings are validated through numerical simulations. 

8: \vspace{9pt}

9: \\

10: \textbf{Keywords:} Parallel computing; Multiple-try Metropolis; Peskun ordering; Spectral gap; Log-concave sampling

11: \end{abstract}

12: