3efd90ee5578aefd.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We describe the effect of replica symmetry breaking in the field distribution function $P(h)$ of the $T=0$ SK-model as the difference between a split Gaussian and the first excited state $\psi_1$ of a weakly anharmonic oscillator with nonanalytic shift by means of the analogy $P(h)\leftrightarrow |\psi_{_1}(x)|$.
3: 
4: New numerical calculations of the leading $100$ orders of replica symmetry breaking (RSB) were performed in order to obtain $P(h)$, employing the exact mapping between density of states $\rho(E)$ of the fermionic SK-model and $P(h)$ of the standard model, as derived by Perez-Castillo and Sherrington.
5: Fast convergence towards a fixed point function $\rho(E)$ for infinite steps of RSB is observed.
6: A surprisingly small number of harmonic oscillator wave-functions suffices to represent this fixed point function. This allows to determine an anharmonic potential $V(x)$ with nonanalytic shift, whose first excited state represents $\rho(E)$ and hence $P(h)$.
7: The harmonic potential with unconventional shift
8: $V_2(x)\sim (|x|-x_0)^2=(x-x_0\,sign(x))^2$ yields already a very good approximation,
9: since anharmonic couplings of $V(x)-V_2(x)\sim |x|^{m}, m>2,$ decay rapidly with increasing $m$.
10: 
11: We compare the pseudogap-forming effect of replica symmetry breaking, hosted by the
12: fermionic SK-model, with the analogous effect in the Coulomb glass as designed by Davies-Lee-Rice and described by M\"uller-Pankov.
13: 
14: %We show that both cases have a hard-gap at $T=0$ under replica symmetry, and conclude %that 1.  is entirely responsible for the $T=0$-pseudogaps in both cases and 2. that the %universality classes of RSB-criticality differ for an SK- and Coulomb-glass hosts.
15: %
16: \end{abstract}