3f5ac4d4007abfa1.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: In many so-called ``beyond-mean-field'' many-body methods, one creates symmetry-breaking states and then 
3: projects out states with good quantum number(s); the most important example is angular 
4: momentum. Motivated by the computational intensity of symmetry restoration, we investigate 
5: the numerical convergence of two competing methods for angular momentum projection with rotations over Euler angles, the textbook-standard projection through quadrature, 
6: and a recently introduced projection through linear algebra. We find well-defined patterns of convergence with increasing 
7: number of mesh points (for quadrature) and cut-offs (for linear algebra).  Because the method of projection through 
8: linear algebra requires inverting matrices generated on a mesh of Euler angles, we discuss two methods for robustly 
9: reducing the number of required evaluations. 
10: %With a firm grasp on the convergence properties of both methods,  we can delineate the relative advantages of projection by linear algebra versus quadrature.  
11: {{%\color{red}{
12: Reviewing the literature, we find our inversion involving rotations about the $z$-axis is equivalent to  trapezoidal
13: `quadrature' commonly used as well as Fomenko projection used for particle-number projection.
14: The efficiency depends upon the number of angular momentum $J$ to be projected, but in general 
15: inversion methods, including Fomenko projection/trapezoidal `quadrature' dramatically improve the efficiency.}}
16: %In general, if one wants
17: %more than just  states with lowest values of angular momentum $J$, projection by linear algebra is at least three times 
18: %more efficient, that is, requires a factor of three fewer evaluations than projection by Gauss-Legendre quadrature, while a `mixed' 
19: %method, combining .
20: \end{abstract}
21: