1: \begin{abstract}
2: The consequences of adopting other definitions of the concepts of sum and
3: convergence of a series are discussed in the light of historical and
4: epistemological contexts. We show that some divergent series appearing in the
5: context of renormalization methods cannot be assigned finite values in a form
6: consistent with Hardy's axioms without at the same time equating one to zero,
7: thus destroying the mathematical building. We show that if the replacements for
8: the concept of sum of a series are required to be associative, to be invariant
9: under finite permutations of the terms and dilution, further restrictions
10: emerge. We finally discuss the epistemological costs of accepting these
11: practices in the name of instrumentalism.
12: \end{abstract}
13: