1: \begin{abstract} Networks of elastoplastic springs (elastoplastic systems) have been linked to differential equations with polyhedral constraints in the pioneering paper by Moreau (1974). Periodic loading of an elastoplastic system, therefore, corresponds to a periodic motion of the polyhedral constraint. According to Krejci (1996), every solution of a sweeping process with a periodically moving constraint asymptotically converges to a periodic orbit.  Understanding whether such an asymptotic periodic orbit is unique or there can be an entire family of asymptotic periodic orbits (that form a periodic attractor) has been an open problem since then. Since suitable small perturbation of a polyhedral constraint seems to be always capable to destroy a potential family of periodic orbits, it is expected that none of potential periodic attractor is  structurally stable. In the present paper we give a simple example to prove that even though the periodic attractor (of non-stationary periodic solutions) can be destroyed by little perturbation of the moving constraint, the periodic attractor resists perturbations of the physical parameters of the mechanical model (i.e. the parameters of the network of elastoplastic springs).  

2: 

3: %This observation concurs with the result of  Frederick-Armstrong (1966) which established convergence of stresses in continuum equations of a cyclically loaded elastoplastic material to a unique output. On the other hand, the result by Frederick-Armstrong is established under an additional assumption called Drucker's postulate. In the present paper we show that 

4: 

5:  

6: 

7: 

8: 

9: \keywords{Elastoplastic springs \and lattice spring model \and 

10: sweeping process \and structural stability \and  cyclic loading \and uniqueness of periodic response}

11: % \PACS{PACS code1 \and PACS code2 \and more}

12: \subclass{34A36  \and 37G15 \and 74C15}

13: \end{abstract}

14: