4385a96e1f2d40f4.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: \noindent 
3: When an iterative method is applied to solve the linear equation system 
4: in interior point methods (IPMs), the attention is usually placed on accelerating their convergence 
5: by designing appropriate preconditioners, but the linear solver is applied 
6: as a black box with a standard termination criterion which asks 
7: for a sufficient reduction of the residual in the linear system. 
8: Such an approach often leads to an unnecessary ''oversolving'' of linear 
9: equations. 
10: %In this paper, it is demonstrated how an IPM can preserve the 
11: %polynomial worst-case complexity when relying on an inner termination 
12: %criterion that is not based on the residual of the linear system. 
13: In this paper, an IPM that relies on an inner termination criterion not based on the residual of the linear system is introduced and analyzed. Moreover, 
14: new indicators for the early termination of the inner iterations are derived 
15: from a deep understanding of IPM needs.
16: The new technique has been adapted to the Conjugate Gradient (CG) 
17: and to the Minimum Residual method (MINRES) applied in the IPM context. 
18: The new criterion has been tested on a set of quadratic optimization 
19: problems including compressed sensing, image processing and instances 
20: with partial differential equation constraints, and it has been
21: compared to standard residual tests with variable tolerance.
22: Evidence gathered from these computational experiments shows that the new 
23: technique delivers significant improvements in terms of inner (linear) 
24: iterations and those translate into significant savings of the IPM 
25: solution time.
26: \end{abstract}