1: \begin{abstract}

2: Weighted bipolar argumentation frameworks offer a tool for

3:  decision support and social media analysis.

4: Arguments are evaluated by an iterative procedure that takes

5: initial weights and attack and support relations into account. 

6: Until recently, convergence of these iterative procedures was not very

7: well understood in cyclic graphs.

8: Mossakowski and Neuhaus recently introduced a unification of different approaches

9: and proved first convergence and divergence results.

10: We build up on this work, simplify and generalize convergence results and 

11: complement them with runtime guarantees.

12: As it turns out, there is a tradeoff between semantics' convergence guarantees

13: and their ability to move strength values away from the initial weights. 

14: We demonstrate that divergence problems can be avoided without this tradeoff

15: by continuizing semantics. 

16: Semantically, we extend the framework with a Duality property that assures 

17: a symmetric impact of attack and support relations.

18: We also present a Java implementation of modular semantics and explain

19:  the practical usefulness of the theoretical ideas. 

20: \end{abstract}

21: