44d97fae053301db.tex
1: \begin{proof} To sketch the proof, pick a subdivision of 
2: the components of $M^{(2)}\setminus (f^{-1}(\mathcal{U})\cup M^{(1)})$
3: into the fewest possible triangles. First homotope $f$ relative to $f^{-1}(\mathcal{U})$,
4:  so that the image of the sides of these triangles becomes geodesic in
5:  their corresponding pieces. Then relatively homotope $f$ 
6:  further, so that the image of these triangles becomes ruled in their corresponding
7:  pieces. If we fix $f|_{M^{(0)}}$, as $\epsilon\to0$, the image of these triangles
8:  converges to geodesic (possibly degenerate) triangles in hyperbolic pieces,
9:  and to horizonally-geodesic (possibly degenerate) triangles in $\HypEuc$-geometric pieces (in the sense of being
10:  geodesic after projecting onto the base-orbifold). Moreover, for each $2$-simplex
11:  of $M^{(2)}$, all except at most one triangle above contained in this $2$-simplex becomes degenerate
12:  in the above sense, while the exceptional one has area at most $\pi$. 
13:  Thus, for sufficiently small $\epsilon>0$, the area of $M^{(2)}$ can be bounded by $2t\pi$ where $2t$ is
14:  the number of $2$-simplices of $M^{(2)}$ with our notations. Using standard hyperbolic geometry estimations,
15:  it is not hard to make the arguments above rigorous, but we omit the details here for conciseness.
16: \end{proof}
17: