1: \begin{abstract}

2: %% Keywords: hopfian, co-hopfian, subsemigroup, extension, finite index, Rees index, Green index.

3: %

4: %% MSC: 20M15 (Primary) 20M10 05C60 (Secondary).

5: %

6: This paper investigates the preservation of hopfic\-ity and

7: co-hopfic\-ity on passing to finite-index subsemigroups and

8: extensions. It was already known that hopfic\-ity is not preserved on

9: passing to finite Rees index subsemigroups, even in the finitely

10: generated case. We give a stronger example to show that it is not

11: preserved even in the finitely presented case. It was also known that

12: hopfic\-ity is not preserved in general on passing to finite Rees

13: index extensions, but that it is preserved in the finitely generated

14: case. We show that, in contrast, hopfic\-ity is not preserved on

15: passing to finite Green index extensions, even within the class of

16: finitely presented semigroups. Turning to co-hopfic\-ity, we prove

17: that within the class of finitely generated semigroups, co-hopfic\-ity

18: is preserved on passing to finite Rees index extensions, but is not

19: preserved on passing to finite Rees index subsemigroups, even in the

20: finitely presented case. Finally, by linking co-hopfic\-ity for graphs

21: to co-hopfic\-ity for semigroups, we show that without the hypothesis

22: of finite generation, co-hopfic\-ity is not preserved on passing to

23: finite Rees index extensions.

24: \keywords{hopfian, co-hopfian, subsemigroup, extension, finite index, Rees index, Green index}

25: \msc{20M15, 20M10, 05C60}

26: \end{abstract}

27: