4555d3862b7e15e2.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2:  
3:  
4:  In this paper, we study the robust linearization of nonlinear poromechanics of unsaturated materials.
5:  The model of interest couples the Richards equation with linear elasticity equations, employing the 
6:  equivalent pore pressure. 
7:  In practice a monolithic solver is not always available, defining the requirement for a linearization scheme
8:  to allow the use of separate simulators, which is not met by the classical Newton method.
9:  We propose three different linearization schemes incorporating the fixed-stress splitting scheme,
10:  coupled with an L-scheme, Modified Picard and Newton linearization of the flow. 
11:  All schemes allow the efficient and robust decoupling of mechanics and flow equations. 
12:  In particular, the simplest scheme, the Fixed-Stress-L-scheme, employs solely constant diagonal stabilization,
13:  has low cost per iteration, and is very robust.
14:  Under mild, physical assumptions, it is theoretically shown to be a contraction. 
15:  Due to possible break-down or slow convergence of all considered splitting schemes, Anderson acceleration 
16:  is applied as post-processing. 
17:  Based on a special case, we justify theoretically the general ability of the Anderson acceleration 
18:  to effectively accelerate convergence and stabilize the underlying scheme, allowing even non-contractive 
19:  fixed-point iterations to converge.
20:  To our knowledge, this is the first theoretical indication of this kind. 
21:  Theoretical findings are confirmed by numerical results. 
22:  In particular, Anderson acceleration has been demonstrated to be very effective for the considered
23:  Picard-type methods.
24:  Finally, the Fixed-Stress-Newton scheme combined with Anderson acceleration provides a robust 
25:  linearization scheme, meeting the above criteria.
26: 
27: \end{abstract}
28: