1: \begin{abstract}

2: \noindent

3: \textbf{Background:} Deuteron-induced one-neutron transfer reactions

4: have been

5: used to extract single-particle properties of nuclei, and the adiabatic

6: (AD) approximation is often used to simply treat the deuteron

7: breakup states. \\

8: \textbf{Purpose:} The primary goal is to examine

9: the validity of the AD approximation for the ($d,p$) reaction

10: systematically.

11: We clarify also the role of the closed channels often

12: ignored in the description of breakup reactions.

13: \\

14: \textbf{Methods:} We calculate the ($d,p$) cross sections with the

15: continuum-discretized coupled-channels method (CDCC) for 128

16: reaction systems and compare the results with those obtained by the

17: CDCC calculation with the AD approximation.

18: Effect of the closed channels are investigated by ignoring

19: them in CDCC. \\

20: \textbf{Results:} The AD approximation affects in general the

21: ($d,p$) cross section by less than 20~\%, but some exceptional

22: ({\it nonadiabatic}) cases for which the AD approximation

23: %%breaks down are found. The closed channels turn out to give  %%Chazono20170613

24: breaks down are found. The closed channels turn out to give

25: significant effects on the cross section at deuteron energies

26: less than about 10~MeV. \\

27: \textbf{Conclusions:} The use of the AD approximation in the

28: description of the ($d,p$) reaction can be justified in many cases,

29: with the uncertainty of less than about 20~\%. The existence of

30: some nonadiabatic cases nevertheless should be realized.

31: The neglect of the closed channels without confirming the

32: convergence of the CDCC result is not recommended.

33: \end{abstract}

34: