1: \begin{abstract}

2: \noindent 

3: Establishing the CCZ-equivalence of a pair of APN functions is generally quite difficult.

4: In some cases, when seeking to show that a putative new infinite

5: family of APN functions is CCZ inequivalent

6: to an already known family, we rely on computer calculation for small values of $n$. 

7: In this paper we present a method to 

8: prove the inequivalence of quadratic APN functions 

9: with the Gold functions.

10: %NEW, check this, we do not solve the computational problem but 

11: %proof that all infinitely many functions are inequivalent 

12: Our main result is that a quadratic function is CCZ-equivalent to the APN Gold function $x^{2^r+1}$

13: if and only if it is EA-equivalent to that Gold function.

14: As an application of this result, we prove that

15: a trinomial family of APN functions

16: that exist on finite fields of order $2^n$ where $n\equiv2\textrm{ mod }4$

17: are CCZ inequivalent to the Gold functions. The proof relies on some knowledge of the 

18: automorphism group of a code associated with such a function.

19: 

20: \keywords

21: {almost perfect nonlinear \and APN \and automorphism group \and CCZ-equivalence \and EA-equivalence \and

22: Gold function}

23: 

24: % \PACS{PACS code1 \and PACS code2 \and more}

25: % \subclass{MSC code1 \and MSC code2 \and more}

26: 

27: \end{abstract}

28: