1: \begin{abstract}

2:   In this letter we compare the behaviour of standard Virtual Element Methods

3:   (VEM) and stabilization free Enlarged Enhancement Virtual Element Methods

4:   (\EEVEM{}) with the focus on some elliptic test problems whose solution and

5:   diffusivity tensor are characterized by anisotropies. Results show that the

6:   possibility to avoid an arbitrary stabilizing part, offered by \EEVEM{}

7:   methods, can reduce the magnitude of the error on general polygonal meshes and

8:   help convergence.

9: \end{abstract}

10: