1: \begin{abstract}

2: Mixture models are a popular tool in model-based clustering. Such

3: a model is often fitted by a procedure that maximizes the

4: likelihood, such as the EM algorithm. At convergence, the

5: maximum likelihood parameter estimates are typically reported, but

6: in most cases little emphasis is placed on the variability

7: associated with these estimates. In part this may be due to

8: the fact that standard errors are not directly calculated in the model-fitting

9: algorithm, either because they are not required to fit the model, or because they are difficult to compute. The

10: examination of standard errors in model-based clustering is therefore

11: typically neglected. The widely used \textbf{R} package

12: \texttt{mclust} has recently introduced bootstrap and weighted likelihood bootstrap methods to facilitate standard error estimation. This paper provides an empirical comparison of these methods (along with the jackknife method) for producing standard errors and confidence intervals for mixture parameters.

13: These methods are illustrated and contrasted in both a simulation study

14: and in the traditional \emph{Old Faithful} data set.

15: \end{abstract}

16: