1: \begin{abstract}

2: In this paper, we address an instance of uniquely solvable mean-field game with a common noise whose corresponding counterpart without common noise has several equilibria. We study the selection problem for this mean-field game without common noise via three approaches. 

3: 

4: A common approach is to select, amongst all the equilibria, those yielding the minimal cost for the representative player. Another one is to select equilibria that are included in the support of the zero noise limit of the mean-field game with common noise. A last one is to select equilibria supported by the limit of the mean-field component of the corresponding $N$-player game as the number of players goes to infinity. The contribution of this paper is to show that, for the class under study, the last two approaches select the same equilibria, but the first approach selects another one.  

5: \vskip 4pt

6: 

7: 

8: %Our strategy is based upon a two-step procedure: First we discuss the zero-noise limit of the decoupling field driving the aforementioned FBSDE.  Second, given the rate of convergence of the decoupling field, we implement the same strategy as that used by DELARUEANDFLANDOLI to solve the zero noise limit problem for standard SDEs.

9: 

10: \noindent \textbf{2010 MSC.} Primary: 60F17, 60H10, 91A13, 91A15. Secondary: 35L65

11: \vskip 4pt

12: 

13: \noindent \textbf{Keywords}: Mean-field game, Linear-quadratic control problem, Common noise, $N$-player game, Selection of equilibria, Peano phenomenon, Vanishing viscosity, Transition point, Scalar conservation law, Burgers equation, Entropy solution.

14: 

15: \end{abstract}

16: