4e15e160b3da585a.tex
1: \begin{abstract} Recursive permutations whose cycles are the classes of a
2: decidable equivalence relation are studied; the set of these permutations is
3: called $\Perm$, the group of all recursive permutations $\G$. Multiple
4: equivalent computable representations of decidable equivalence relations are
5: provided. $\G$-conjugacy in $\Perm$ is characterised by computable isomorphy
6: of cycle equivalence relations. This result parallels the equivalence of
7: cycle type equality and conjugacy in the full symmetric group of the natural
8: numbers.
9: 
10: Conditions are presented for a permutation $f \in \G$ to be in $\Perm$ and
11: for a decidable equivalence relation to appear as the cycle relation of a
12: member of $\G$. In particular, two normal forms for the cycle structure of
13: permutations are defined and it is shown that conjugacy to a permutation in
14: the first normal form is equivalent to membership in $\Perm$. $\Perm$ is
15: further characterised as the set of maximal permutations in a family of
16: preordered subsets of automorphism groups of decidable equivalences.
17: 
18: Conjugacy to a permutation in the second normal form corresponds to
19: decidable cycles plus decidable cycle finiteness problem. Cycle decidability
20: and cycle finiteness are both shown to have the maximal one-one degree of
21: the Halting Problem. Cycle finiteness is used to prove that conjugacy in
22: $\Perm$ cannot be decided and that it is impossible to compute cycle
23: deciders for products of members of $\Perm$ and finitary permutations. It
24: is also shown that $\Perm$ is not recursively enumerable and that it is not
25: a group.
26: \end{abstract}
27: