1: \begin{abstract}

2: I introduce a new iterative method to solve problems in small-strain non-linear elasticity. 

3: %

4: The method is inspired by recent work in data-driven computational mechanics, 

5: %

6: which reformulated the classic boundary value problem of continuum mechanics using the concept of ``phase space''. 

7: %

8: The latter is an abstract metric space, whose coordinates are indexed by strains and stress components, where each possible state of the discretized body corresponds to a point. 

9: %

10: Since the phase space is associated to the discretized body, it is finite dimensional. 

11: %

12: Two subsets are then defined: an affine space termed ``physically-admissible set'' made up by those points that satisfy equilibrium and a ``materially-admissible set'' containing points that satisfy the constitutive law. 

13: %

14: Solving the boundary-value problem amounts to finding the intersection between these two subdomains. 

15: %

16: In the linear-elastic setting, this can be achieved through the solution of a set of linear equations; when material non-linearity enters the picture, such is not the case anymore and iterative solution approaches are necessary. 

17: %

18: Our iterative method consists on projecting points alternatively from one set to the other, until convergence. 

19: %

20: The method is similar in spirit to the ``method of alternative projections'' and to the ``method of projections onto convex sets'', 

21: %

22: for which there is a solid mathematical foundation that furnishes conditions for existence and uniqueness of solutions, 

23: %

24: upon which we rely to uphold our new method's performance.   

25: % POCS

26: % Von Neumann

27: We present two examples to illustrate the applicability of the method, and to showcase its strengths when compared to the classic Newton-Raphson method, 

28: %

29: the usual tool of choice in non-linear continuum mechanics.

30: \end{abstract}

31: