4ed66eaddee1a2a8.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: 	%Set also locally
3: 	\parindent0mm
4: 	\parskip0mm
5: 	\noindent
6: In many image and signal processing applications, as interferometric synthetic
7: aperture radar (SAR) or color image restoration in HSV or LCh spaces the data has
8: its range on the one-dimensional sphere $\mathbb S^1$.
9: Although the minimization of total variation (TV) regularized functionals is
10: among the most popular methods for edge-preserving image restoration such
11: methods were only very recently applied to cyclic structures.
12: However, as for Euclidean data, TV regularized variational methods
13: suffer from the so called staircasing effect. This effect can be avoided
14: by involving higher order derivatives into the functional.
15: 
16: This is the first paper which uses higher order differences of cyclic data
17: in regularization terms of energy functionals for image restoration.
18: We introduce absolute higher order differences for
19: $\mathbb S^1$-valued data in a sound way which
20: is independent of the chosen representation system on the circle.
21: Our absolute cyclic first order difference is just the
22: geodesic distance between points. Similar to the geodesic distances the
23: absolute cyclic second order differences have only values in $[0,\pi]$.
24: We update the cyclic variational TV approach by our new cyclic second order
25: differences. To minimize the corresponding functional we apply a cyclic
26: proximal point method which was recently successfully proposed for Hadamard
27: manifolds. Choosing appropriate cycles this algorithm can be implemented in an
28: efficient way. The main steps require the evaluation of proximal mappings of
29: our cyclic differences for which we provide analytical expressions.
30: Under certain conditions we prove the convergence of our algorithm.
31: Various numerical examples with artificial as well as real-world data demonstrate the
32: advantageous performance of our algorithm.
33: \end{abstract}
34: