1: \begin{abstract}
2: In this paper, we discuss a voting model in which voters can obtain information from a finite number of previous voters. There exist three groups of voters:
3:
4: (i) digital herders and independent voters,
5:
6: (ii) analog herders and independent voters, and
7:
8: (iii) $\tanh$-type herders.
9:
10:
11: In our previous paper \cite{Hisakado3}, we used the mean field approximation for case (i). In that study, if the reference number $r$ is above three, phase transition occurs and the solution converges to one of the equilibria.
12: However, the conclusion is different from mean field approximation. In this paper, we show that the solution oscillates between the two states.
13: A good (bad) equilibrium is where a majority of $r$ select the correct (wrong) candidate.
14: In this paper, we show that there is no phase transition when $r$ is finite.
15: If the annealing schedule is adequately slow from finite $r$ to infinite $r$, the voting rate converges only to the good equilibrium.
16:
17: In case (ii), the state of reference votes is equivalent to that of Kirman's ant colony model, and it follows beta binomial distribution.
18: %In the large $r$ limit, it becomes the beta distribution.
19:
20:
21: In case (iii), we show that the model is equivalent to the finite-size kinetic Ising model. If the voters are rational, a simple herding experiment of information cascade is conducted. Information cascade results from the quenching of the kinetic Ising model.
22: %In our experiment, we observed that an individual behaves as a tanh-type herder.
23: %Further, we show why the herding behavior is described by the Ising model and
24: % why an information cascade is phase transition of Ising model when $r$ is infinite.
25: As case (i) is the limit of case (iii) when $\tanh$ function becomes a step function, the phase transition can be observed in infinite size limit. We can confirm that there is no phase transition when the reference number $r$ is finite.
26: \end{abstract}