1: \begin{abstract}

2: Accurate trajectory-tracking control for quadrotors is essential for safe navigation in cluttered environments.

3: However, this is challenging in agile flights due to nonlinear dynamics, complex aerodynamic effects, and actuation constraints. 

4: In this article, we empirically compare two state-of-the-art control frameworks: the nonlinear-model-predictive controller (NMPC) and the differential-flatness-based controller (DFBC), by tracking a wide variety of agile trajectories at speeds up to \add{20~\si{m/s} (i.e., 72~\si{km/h})}. The comparisons are performed in both simulation and real-world environments to systematically evaluate both methods from the aspect of tracking accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency. 

5: We show the superiority of NMPC in tracking dynamically infeasible trajectories, at the cost of higher computation time and risk of numerical convergence issues.

6: For both methods, we also quantitatively study the effect of adding an inner-loop controller using the incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion (INDI) method, and the effect of adding an aerodynamic drag model.

7: Our real-world experiments, performed in one of the world's largest motion capture systems, demonstrate more than 78\% tracking error reduction of both NMPC and DFBC, indicating the necessity of using an inner-loop controller and aerodynamic drag model for agile trajectory tracking.

8: \end{abstract}

9: