514b8a74fb376f64.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Assessing the convergence of a biomolecular simulation is an essential 
3: part of any careful computational investigation, because many 
4: fundamental aspects of molecular behavior 
5: %important 
6: %quantities (e.g., free energy differences) 
7: depend on the relative populations 
8: of different conformers.
9: %; insufficient convergence translates into 
10: %systematic errors. 
11: Here we present a physically intuitive method to self-consistently 
12: assess the convergence of trajectories generated by molecular dynamics 
13: and related methods. 
14: Our approach reports directly and systematically on the 
15: structural diversity of a simulation trajectory. Straightforward 
16: clustering and classification steps are the key ingredients, 
17: allowing the approach to be trivially applied to systems of any size. 
18: Our initial study on met-enkephalin strongly suggests that even fairly 
19: long trajectories ($\sim 50$ nsec) may not be converged for this 
20: small---but highly flexible---system.
21: %Standard clustering methods first 
22: %generate a set of reference structures to any desired precision. The 
23: %trajectory is then classified by proximity to the reference structures, 
24: %yielding a one-dimensional histogram of structurally distinct populations. 
25: %Comparing ensembles 
26: %of different trajectories (or different parts of the same trajectory) built 
27: %with the same reference structures provides a sensitive, quantitative measure
28: %of convergence. Please note: this is a preliminary manuscript, and should 
29: %be read as such. Comments are most welcome, especially regarding pertinent 
30: %prior work. 
31: \end{abstract}
32: