1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: \noindent

4: In the study by Sadeghi \& Oberlack [\href{https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.413}{JFM~899,~A10~(2020)}] it is claimed that new scaling laws are derived for the case of passive scalar

5: dynamics under the influence of a constant mean gradient in decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence. However, these scaling laws are not new and have already been derived and discussed in

6: \href{http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015t34sm99d}{Bahri (2016)}. No novel analytical achievements are made by Sadeghi \& Oberlack, as the title of their study misleadingly wants to suggest. In fact, the already established self-similar scaling laws obtained by Bahri through simple dimensional analysis are already more general in the application than the ones obtained by Sadeghi \& Oberlack through an overly complicated and therefore unnecessarily performed Lie-group symmetry analysis. The~claim that it has the virtue of not being an {\it ad-hoc} method is not true. Because, instead of using an {\it a~priori} set of scales as the classical~method, the Lie-group method has to make use of an {\it a~priori} set of symmetries, namely to select the correct relevant symmetries from an infinite and thus unclosed set. For~example,

7: a nonphysical scaling symmetry is selected which in the course of the analysis has to be discarded since it is not compatible with the data simulated. Hence, the Lie-group symmetry method in turbulence is just another common trial-and-error method and not a first-principle method that can bypass the closure problem.

8: 

9: \vspace{0.5em}\noindent{\footnotesize{\bf Keywords:} {\it Statistical Physics, Turbulence, Symmetry Analysis, Lie-Groups, Scaling, Closure Problem}}

10: \end{abstract}