1: \begin{abstract}

2:     We consider an alternative to the Monte Carlo method for dust continuous radiative transfer simulations: the Quasi-Monte Carlo method.

3:     We briefly discuss what it is, its history, and possible implementations.

4:     We compare the Monte Carlo method with four pseudo-random number generators and five Quasi-Monte Carlo implementations

5:     using different low-discrepancy sequences and the Hammersley set.

6:     For the comparison, we study different test matter geometries and problems.

7:     We present comparison results for single scatterings of radiation from a point source,

8:     multiple scatterings of radiation from a point source, and single scatterings of radiation from a spherical star.

9:     In all cases, Quasi-Monte Carlo shows better convergence than Monte Carlo.

10:     In several test cases, the gain in computation time to achieve a fixed error value reached 40 times.

11:     We obtained ten times speed up in many of the considered tests.

12: \end{abstract}

13: