1: \begin{abstract}

2: We study a general scalarization approach via utility functions in multi-objective optimization. 

3: It consists of maximizing utility which is obtained from the objectives’ bargaining with regard to a disagreement reference point. 

4: The theoretical framework for a broad class of utility functions from microeconomics is developed. 

5: For that, we associate a utility-dependent single-objective optimization problem with the given multi-objective optimization problem.

6: We show that Pareto optimal points of the latter can be recovered by solving the former. 

7: In particular, Cobb-Douglas, Leontief, and CES utility functions are considered.

8: We prove that any Pareto optimal point can be obtained as a solution of scalarization via one of the mentioned utility functions. 

9: Further, we propose a numerical

10: scheme to solve utility-dependent single-objective optimization problems. Here, the main difficulty comes from the necessity to address constraints which are associated with a disagreement reference point.

11: Our crucial observation is that the explicit treatment of these additional constraints may be avoided. 

12: This is the case if the Slater condition is satisfied and the utility function under consideration has the so-called

13: barrier property. 

14: Under these assumptions, we prove the convergence of our scheme to Pareto optimal points. 

15: Numerical experiments on real-world financial datasets in a portfolio selection context confirm the efficiency of our scalarization approach via utility functions.

16:     \end{abstract}

17: