5554e137e1aecd9a.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Understanding the applicability and limitations of electronic-structure methods needs careful 
3: and efficient comparison with accurate reference data. 
4: Knowledge of the quality and errors of electronic-structure calculations is crucial to advanced
5: method development, high-throughput computations and data analyses.
6: In this paper, we present a test set for computational materials science and engineering (MSE), 
7: that aims to provide accurate and easily accessible crystal properties for a hierarchy of 
8: exchange-correlation approximations, ranging from the well-established mean-field 
9: approximations to the state-of-the-art methods of many-body perturbation theory. 
10: We consider cohesive energy, lattice constant and bulk modulus as 
11: representatives for the first- and second-row elements and their binaries with cubic crystal 
12: structures and various bonding characters. A strong effort is made to push the borders of 
13: numerical accuracy for cohesive properties as calculated using the local-density approximation 
14: (LDA), several generalized gradient approximations (GGAs), meta-GGAs and hybrids in 
15: \textit{all-electron} resolution, and the second-order M\o{}ller-Plesset perturbation theory
16: (MP2) and the random-phase approximation (RPA) with frozen-core approximation based on 
17: \textit{all-electron} Hartree-Fock, PBE and/or PBE0 references.
18: This results in over 10,000 calculations, which record a comprehensive convergence test with respect to numerical parameters for a wide range of
19: electronic structure methods within the numerical atom-centered orbital framework.
20: As an indispensable part of the MSE test set, a web site is established 
21: \href{http://mse.fhi-berlin.mpg.de}{\texttt{http://mse.fhi-berlin.mpg.de}}. This
22: not only allows for easy access to all reference data, but also provides user-friendly graphical 
23: tools for post-processing error analysis.
24: 
25: 
26: \end{abstract}
27: