1: \begin{abstract}

2: The projected subgradient method for constrained minimization repeatedly

3: interlaces subgradient steps for the objective function with projections

4: onto the feasible region, which is the intersection of closed and

5: convex constraints sets, to regain feasibility. The latter poses a

6: computational difficulty and, therefore, the projected subgradient

7: method is applicable only when the feasible region is ``simple to

8: project onto\textquotedblright{}. In contrast to this, in the superiorization

9: methodology a feasibility-seeking algorithm leads the overall process

10: and objective function steps are interlaced into it. This makes a

11: difference because the feasibility-seeking algorithm employs projections

12: onto the individual constraints sets and not onto the entire feasible

13: region.

14: 

15: We present the two approaches side-by-side and demonstrate their performance

16: on a problem of computerized tomography image reconstruction, posed

17: as a constrained minimization problem aiming at finding a constraint-compatible

18: solution that has a reduced value of the total variation of the reconstructed

19: image.

20: 

21: \keywords{constrained minimization, feasibility-seeking, bounded convergence, superiorization, projected subgradient method, proximity function, strong perturbation resilience, image reconstruction, computerized tomography}

22: 

23: \PACS{65K05, 90C59, 65B99, 49M30, 90C90, 90C30}

24: \end{abstract}

25: