1: \begin{abstract}

2: Let $K$ be a field, let $G$ be a finite group, and let $\bar X\rightarrow \bar Y$ be a $G$-Galois branched cover of varieties over $K^{\oper{sep}}$.

3: Given a mere cover model $X\rightarrow Y$ of this cover over $K$, in Part I of this paper I observe that there is a unique minimal field $E$ over which

4: $X\rightarrow Y$ becomes Galois, and I prove that $E/K$ is Galois with group a subgroup of $\oper{Aut}(G)$. In Part II of this paper, by making the additional

5: assumption that $K$ is a field of definition (i.e., that there exists \it some \rm Galois model over $K$), I am able to give an explicit

6: description of the unique minimal field of Galois action for $X\rightarrow Y$. Namely, if there exists a $K$-rational point of $X$ above an unramified point $P\in Y(K)$

7: then $E$ is contained in the intersection of the specializations at $P$ in the various different $G$-Galois models of $\bar X\rightarrow \bar Y$ over $K$.

8: Using the same proof mechanism, I observe a reverse version of ``The Twisting Lemma'', which asserts that the behavior of the $K$-rational 

9: points on the various mere cover models over $K$, and the behavior of the specializations on the various $G$-Galois models 

10: over $K$, are all governed by a single equivalence 

11: relation (independent of the model) on the 

12: $K$-rational points of the base variety.

13: \\ \\

14: MSC classes:	14H30, 14G05, 11S20, 12F12

15: \end{abstract}

16: