1: \begin{abstract}

2:     Online extremism has severe societal consequences, including normalizing hate speech, user radicalization, and increased social divisions. 

3:     Various mitigation strategies have been explored to address these consequences.

4:     One such strategy uses positive interventions: controlled signals that add attention to the opinion ecosystem to boost certain opinions. 

5:     To evaluate the effectiveness of positive interventions, we introduce the Opinion Market Model (\omm), a two-tier online opinion ecosystem model that considers both inter-opinion interactions and the role of positive interventions. 

6:     The size of the opinion attention market is modeled in the first tier using the multivariate discrete-time Hawkes process; 

7:     in the second tier, opinions cooperate and compete for market share, given limited attention using the market share attraction model. 

8:     We demonstrate the convergence of our proposed estimation scheme on a synthetic dataset. 

9:     Next, we test \omm on two learning tasks, applying to two real-world datasets to predict attention market shares and uncover latent relationships between online items.

10:     The first dataset comprises Facebook and Twitter discussions containing moderate and far-right opinions about bushfires and climate change. 

11:     The second dataset captures popular VEVO artists' YouTube and Twitter attention volumes.

12:     \omm outperforms the state-of-the-art predictive models on both datasets and captures latent cooperation-competition relations. 

13:     We uncover (1) self- and cross-reinforcement between far-right and moderate opinions on the bushfires and (2) pairwise artist relations that correlate with real-world interactions such as collaborations and long-lasting feuds.

14:     Lastly, we use \omm as a testbed for positive interventions and show how media coverage modulates the spread of far-right opinions.

15: \end{abstract}

16: